Meanwhile, Real Madrid last week became the final club to end a dispute over a breakaway European Super League, with Uefa and European Football Clubs – an independent body representing more than 800 clubs – saying an “agreement of principles” had been reached “for the good of European club football”.
Elsewhere, Latvia – which does not have a domestic TV deal – has proposed a combined ‘Baltic League’ with Lithuania and Estonia to try to drive revenues and make clubs more competitive in Europe.
The UEC – which represents more than 140 clubs – has ideas of its own, as well as calling for transparency and dialogue.
One is a new domestic media rights protection policy that would reinvest a portion of European competition media revenues into nations where it exceeds domestic rights.
Another is a player development reward policy that reimburses clubs who are not in the Champions League when a player they trained features in the competition – they believe in recent seasons almost 1,500 clubs would have benefited.
The focus is on increasing competition at a domestic level in the hope that will eventually help “smaller leagues” be more competitive in Europe.
This year’s Champions League debutants – Bodo, Kairat, Pafos and USG – appear to have come from leagues with a greater spread of recent winners.
“There is no clear and easy solution because if you help Qarabag or Benfica or USG or a team from a non-big four league to grow its revenue a lot, then all the teams behind it in that league get stretched away,” says Muzio.
“It’s very important that us, as the UEC of stakeholders, don’t try and pretend like there’s a magic wand you can just wave.
“There will need to be a lot of work over a long period of time to try and balance things out to make things fair again.”