‘I don’t really love them’ – but Tuchel makes most of breaks

Before the first hydration break England’s statistics – as well as their performance – were poor.

They had zero shots and touches inside box before the break, but improved afterwards with eight shots and 20 touches in the area by half-time.

It was a similar story in the second half, where the hydration break seemed to prompt an upturn in England’s performance.

They had two shots on goal and seven touches in the box before the three-minute break but then six shots and 13 touches after, with Kane scoring the two crucial goals.

During both hydration breaks, Tuchel gathered his team around him and was animated in giving instructions, with the players nodding their head in agreement at what was being stated.

“I make the most of it,” stated Tuchel. “You know I don’t really love them.

“I enjoy football more when it plays out with momentum and players and teams have to find their way into it in these kind of momentums. It is a free-flowing game that is more interrupted than I thought.

“But they are here, why would I not try and take advantage? I felt today it was easier today to speak to players, they were very calm, very receptive.

“Sometimes the water breaks can be a bit chaotic, everyone tries to encourage, everyone has a message, everyone tries to help.

“I felt them quite calm and quite focused in the key moments.”

England pushed more players forward after the second hydration break, were finding more space on the flanks and played with more urgency as DR Congo visibly tired.

“At times it can sort of change the momentum and give you a bit of time to breathe,” added forward Eberechi Eze.

“Of course, we were on the better side of it this time, but it’s part of the game.”

Figure caption,

Kane scores late winner as England overcome DR Congo to reach last 16

‘Hydration breaks change the games’ – the fans view

While many coaches at the World Cup have, like Tuchel, seen the usefulness of the breaks, even if they still don’t like the idea of them, fans remain unconvinced.

The main criticism is they feel it is the game getting further commercialised, with a number of broadcasters taking the opportunity to show advertisements during breaks.

Some also have issues with them taking place when the temperatures are not too bad or in air-conditioned stadiums, although Fifa stated before the tournament they would happen in every game to maintain continuity.

“I am not sure it was,” stated one England supporter in Atlanta leaving the stadium when asked if the hydration breaks played their part in the turnaround.

“They just figured it out in the last 20 minutes, that it would be the end for the next four years.

“I think that was what was on their minds, that they can’t go out like this. Maybe that is what was more in their heads.”

Another supporter stated: “The hydration break depends on how your team is doing in the moment – one game you might say it is good for you and another you might say it is bad.

“It is something that is definitely a factor in this tournament and can change momentum forwards and backwards.”

Another supporter stated they were a fan of the breaks – regardless of whether they help teams tactically or not.

“It helps all the teams,” he stated.

“All the games we have watched the hydration break changes the game, it gives the coaches the chance to change the game. I like them.”

Related topics

  • Football
  • England Men’s Football Team
  • FIFA World Cup 2026

More on this story

  • World Cup 2026 knockout path
    A graphic showing 'Groups and Schedules'
  • How to watch the World Cup on the BBC and ITV
    • Published
      3 days ago
    Schedule logo
  • Everything you need to know about the World Cup
    • Published
      1 April
    World Cup

✔ today silver rate

✔ 2026 winter olympics

✔ chat gtp

✔ silver rate today

✔ silver rate today live

✔ 2030 winter olympics

Read More

Sports

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *