In robust exchanges Collier-Keywood defended the union’s plans, and suggested no decision had yet been made on which team would play in west Wales.

“I was brought in as an independent chair on a mandate of change,” he told the committee.

“Change is never easy, we recognise, and we are in the midst of significant change.

“My mandate was change and I think we are in the course of delivering that change.

“We recognise that is very painful but we are committed to delivering that change. You didn’t ask me to retain the status quo.”

On the union’s plans he added: “Am I inclined to throw that away two months into its implementation?

“Honestly, probably not, because I think you asked me to bring this change so that Welsh rugby would have a strong, proud sustainable future, and we’ve just started that process.”

Asked by committee chair Delyth Jewell what message he had for fans if the EGM proposals were to be voted through, Collier-Keywood stated “it really feels like a step backwards”.

He added: “We have professionalised governance, and it would be a totally backward step if you effectively reverse the changes that took place in March 2023”, a time at which the WRU made changes to its board.

Collier-Keywood also suggested that “no decisions” had been made as to which team would play in the west of Wales, although supporters and players at Ospreys feel their side is most likely to be cut, especially as Ospreys owners Y11 are in talks with the WRU to buy rivals Cardiff.

He told the committee: “The assumption was that Ospreys was going to be the club that was killed off.

“That is not the case in terms of what will necessarily happen as a result of Y11 owning two clubs.

“There is a totally separate process the WRU are going through of how we decide to award the licences.

“There is one west licence.

“Going forward I expect that we will carry out a fair and transparent process to determine who gets that licence. We have not done that yet.

“We will carry out that process because there may be some conditions we will put into that licence about where rugby needs to be played.”

Supporters of the side – based in Swansea, but playing this season in Bridgend – have demonstrated against the plans.

He was accused by committee member Alun Davies of living in a “parallel universe” if he thought Scarlets supporters would cross the river Loughor to watch their rugby, or that people in Bridgend or Swansea would watch the Scarlets play in Swansea.

Later in the session he admitted that it was a “fair reflection” that the WRU had “really struggled to bring the professional clubs with us on this journey.”

Thorne accepted that some people were angry, but told the committtee: “there’s also a very strong number of clubs who don’t feel like that. And so when we’re in the districts, we hear both sides of those elements.”

The WRU maintains that the only way for Welsh professional rugby to remain competitive and to be able to fund other parts of the sport such as a national academy and coach development programmes is to cut the number of teams.

Collier-Keywood stated that the WRU and the current sides were did not have the finances to be competitive because the cash and the player-base was spread too thinly.

A date for the EGM is yet to be verified.

Wales’ next Six Nations match is in Dublin against Ireland a week on Friday.

More top stories

‘Exceptionally rare’ Roman lead blocks found on farmland
Life sentence for man who shook girlfriend’s five-month-old baby to death
I dropped to the floor and couldn’t move – spiking can happen anywhere
Wales
Welsh Parliament

✔ today silver rate

✔ 2026 winter olympics

✔ chat gtp

✔ silver rate today

✔ silver rate today live

✔ 2030 winter olympics

Read More

Sports

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *