• Chelsea’s James could miss weeks with hamstring injury

    • Published
      15 minutes ago

The signings named in the report

  • Ramires – £17m from Benfica in August 2010

  • Luiz – £21.3m from Benfica in February 2011

  • Hazard – £32m from Lille in June 2012

  • Schurrle – £18m from Bayer Leverkusen in June 2013

  • Eto’o – free transfer from Anzhi Makhachkala in August 2013

  • Willian – £30m from Anzhi Makhachkala in August 2013

  • Matic – £21m from Benfica in January 2014

Chelsea league finishes and honours in period covered by the charges

Premier League:

  • 2010-11 2nd

  • 2011-12 6th

  • 2012-13 3rd

  • 2013-14 3rd

  • 2014-15 1st

  • 2015-16 10th

  • 2016-17 1st

  • 2017-18 5th

Premier League winners: 2014-15 and 2016-17

FA Cup winners: 2011–12, 2017–18

League Cup winners: 2014–15

Champions League winners: 2011–12

Europa League winners: 2012–13

Analysis: Chelsea relieved but academy ban a setback

By

Nizaar Kinsella

Football reporter

Chelsea will be relieved to avoid a sporting sanction, which had been the primary concern since the Boehly and Clearlake Capital ownership revealed discrepancies discovered during their purchase of the club from Abramovich.

The club notes that the Premier League’s investigation shows that even if the higher estimated costs of the off‑books payments to agents had been included in previous Profitability and Sustainability Rules calculations, the club would still have been compliant.

Their statement also stresses that they effectively opened up their entire book-keeping system to the Premier League for the purposes of the investigation.

All parties say thousands of documents were reviewed.

The nine‑month academy transfer ban is a setback. It applies to all age groups above the entry‑level under‑nines, although it will not affect overseas recruitment.

The ban was issued because of “early contact” made without the selling club’s permission.

However, Chelsea point out these breaches occurred under the previous leadership.

The fact the mitigating circumstances highlighted that the fine could have been £20m – and that a transfer ban and a points deduction were also considered – shows how Chelsea’s decision to be fully co-operative was a sound judgement.

Related topics

  • Chelsea
  • Premier League
  • Football

More on this story

  • Recent Chelsea news, analysis and fan views
    Stamford Bridge
  • Ask about Chelsea – what do you want to know?
    Ask Me Anything logo

✔ today silver rate

✔ 2026 winter olympics

✔ chat gtp

✔ silver rate today

✔ silver rate today live

✔ 2030 winter olympics

Read More

Sports

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *